We now live in a
world in which communication is fast-paced and it is expected to have quick
responses. This is made easier with emails, which have seem to have taken over
our lives. I know that this is the case of many people, myself included. If I
am not in class, I will check my email at least every hour. When I am waiting
for a quick response from another individual, I will continue to check it a
couple of times an hour until I receive the responding email. It is definitely less
common today to send and receive letters, since they require more time to write
and actually mail to the individual. I very rarely hear of people sending
letters to others. Anne Applebaum from the Washington Post supports the change
to a fast-pace environment that we see in today’s world: “One of
the people who wrote letters to me 20 years ago is now so busy that he can't be
expected to take a phone call, let alone write a letter. When I communicate
with the rest of my old pen pals, I do so by e-mail, usually a few sentences at
a time.” But there is definitely a difference between writing an
email and writing a letter that relates to etiquette. Etiquette should be
expected in everyday interactions, and sometimes this is not the case with the
quick-pace world that we live in today.
E-mail is
intended to convey instant thought and to evoke fast responses—they lack
emotional depth. There are times when people will respond to an email quickly
without reflecting on their tone. I am sometimes guilty of this; there have
been times when I am in such a rush that my main goal is to quickly respond to
an email and I forget to check how the email will come across to the other
person. There are times when the email
came off negatively to the reader when I had no intention of being negative or
rude. I like the advice given in the podcast, to make sure you wait at least 10
seconds before you “send” an email. I think it is important to read over your
emails so that they are not misunderstood by the reader. Applebaum says ““Letters
have gone the way of the gentle anecdote, the meandering sentence and the
ironic paragraph. Try lengthy irony in an e-mail, and you'll be misunderstood.
Try it even in a newspaper column, and you risk furious attack.”
When writing
letters, we have more time to think about etiquette. Letters are lengthier than
emails and this gives us more time to process what we are writing. Therefore, we
can go back and change a sentence that we wrote previously if we incorrectly
stated it. Also, after writing a letter, we have a much longer time before we “send”
or mail the letter, when compared to an email. This is enough time to think about
the letter and change the content if need be.
Overall, I would
take the advice given in the podcast, to count to 10 before sending an email.
Even though this is a very short period of time, it could be enough time to
evaluate when you wrote in the email and change any wording that may lead the
reader to any misconceptions.
Applebaum, Anne. "When We Wrote Letters." Washington Post. The Washington
Post, 31 July 2007. Web. 21 Mar. 2012.
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/30/AR2007073001272.html>.
No comments:
Post a Comment