I recently read an article about new
social networks that are gaining popularity. Facebook accounts are often open
to more than one’s close friends. This can sometimes force users to filter what
they post or the photos and information that they share.
I know that in many
cases with teenagers or young adults, the user does not wish to share the
personal information that they share with their friends with family members.
There are new social networks that are coming about which take advantage of the
privacy faults of Facebook and other similar networks.
These newer networks, such as
FamilyLeaf and Pair, vary in their privacy controls. FamilyLeaf is restricted
to family members and allows the user to share family pictures and news in an
easy to use forum. Pair is used with one other person and is available only on
smartphones.
I
took interest in Pair. With Pair, users can send a text message, photograph or
video. It also includes some settings that, in my opinion, are a little much.
The couple sharing a Pair network can simultaneously create a drawing, share a
to-do list, and “thumbkiss.” Thumbkissing is what it sounds like. Both users
align their thumbs on the screen in order to cause their phones to vibrate in a
“kiss.” There is another setting in which the user can find out their pair
partner’s location. While this feature could come in handy in various
situations, as in parent-child pairs, I am not sure that I consider it to be
completely necessary. In my opinion technology is connecting us too much; there
is a reason why we are not with someone at all times. Networks like Pair are
taking advantage of today’s technological capabilities, which is great, but are
beginning to cross the line of what really needs to be shared in cyberspace.
Some say that Pair is an easier way to
stay connected to a special someone, like a girl/boyfriend or close friend,
because there are no risks of accidently sharing information with the wrong
person via text message. However, I believe that claim is made in order to
justify Pair. It would be possible for someone to message or send photos to a
friend through Facebook or e-mail.
FamilyLeaf and Pair were created in order
to make social networks more intimate. In my opinion they are becoming too
intimate. While it is great that we are creating new methods to contact others
and share information, I am beginning to become weary of how our privacy is
going to be saved.
STROSS, RANDALL. "Path,
FamilyLeaf and Pair, Small-by-Design Social Networks - NYTimes.com." NY Times Advertisement. N.p.,
n.d. Web. 17 Apr. 2012. <http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/15/business/path-familyleaf-and-pair-small-by- design-social- networks.html?_r=1&ref=technology>.
Thumbkissing? I can see why you think technology is becoming a little too much. In my opinion both of those social networking sites are unnecessary. There are so many different site already up, like you said, that do the same things. Yes, you can be intimate without the possibility of other people seeing, but just don't be stupid and make sure you are sending things to the correct person.
ReplyDeleteFirst of all, I just literally LOLed at thumbkissing. Second of all, I definitely agree with you that social networks are becoming too intimate. It's taking away from personal connections because instead the personal connections are totally technological.
ReplyDelete